01
Brokers and execution platforms
Make MADO Risk part of the order journey, then extend the integration toward execution quality and market data over time.
MADO / PARTNERSHIPS
We are not looking for two logos in one announcement. We are looking for leverage that makes the product better, faster to distribute, or easier to prove.
MADO Risk is the commercial starting point. The five arms create a larger surface for distribution, integration, data, and research partnerships — but every partnership must end in a measurable result.
WHERE IS THE LEVERAGE?
Four partnership types that can compress years, not merely weeks.
02
Prop firms and funded programs
Turn program rules from conditions a trader reads into policy that can be checked before a breach becomes an account loss.
03
Data and financial infrastructure providers
Build Markets and Intelligence on reliable data and explicit contracts instead of fragile integrations and unauditable sources.
04
Universities, labs, and research partners
Test hypotheses, metrics, and simulations through MADO Labs, with a clear gate for what deserves to reach product.
WHAT CAN BE BUILT NOW
We begin with MADO Risk because a partnership needs a real product, not a beautiful roadmap.
A partner can work with us today on Risk distribution, an execution integration, a Desk or prop-firm pilot, or a bounded institutional scope. The other arms enter as early design and research partnerships, not completed products.
01
A Risk Audit pilot for a community or funded program.
02
An initial pre-trade risk-check integration.
03
A Desk scope with shared policy and separated authority.
04
An early design program for data, intelligence, or capital allocation.
When do we say yes?
- 01The problem is specific and measurable before and after the partnership.
- 02There is a real user or decision, not only a hypothetical use case.
- 03Each party knows its data, authority, and responsibility boundaries.
- 04A small scope can prove value before a large agreement.
- 05The partnership does not depend on return promises or unverifiable performance claims.
What do we put on the table?
- 01A written scope and success metric before work starts.
- 02A clear integration path and data-responsibility map.
- 03A testable demo or pilot rather than theatre.
- 04A written review of what we learned and what deserves expansion.
- 05A clear right for either party to stop when value is not proven.
The best partnership is not the largest. It proves something important quickly enough to earn expansion.
Tell us: who is the user, what is the decision, where does the current system fail, and what result will we measure together?